Alerting Comparison - AWS SNS vs. Google Cloud Pub Sub
Alerting services play a crucial role in today's cloud infrastructure, where downtime or failures can cause severe damages. AWS SNS and Google Cloud Pub Sub are two widely used alerting services in the market. In this blog post, we will be making a factual, unbiased comparison between AWS SNS and Google Cloud Pub Sub in various aspects.
Integration and Compatibility
AWS SNS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as AWS Lambda, Amazon SQS, and Amazon EC2. Furthermore, it offers push and email-based notifications, which makes it compatible with any application that supports HTTP or HTTPS. Similarly, Google Cloud Pub Sub can connect with other Google Cloud services such as Google Cloud Functions, Google Cloud Storage, and Google Cloud Run, among others. Additionally, it supports email notifications and push notifications to mobile devices via Firebase.
Winner: TIE
Both services are equally compatible with their respective cloud services and offer email notifications. AWS SNS provides an edge in the way it can provide instant notifications via HTTP or HTTPS requests.
Performance
When comparing performance, AWS SNS has an edge in delivering low-latency notifications. It offers a reliability of 99.9% and can deliver millions of notifications per second. On the other hand, Google Cloud Pub Sub can deliver messages at a slightly slower pace as compared to AWS SNS.
Winner: AWS SNS
AWS SNS has the upper hand in delivering low-latency notifycations with a reliability of 99.9% and millions of notifications per second.
Pricing
AWS SNS charges $0.50 per million publish requests per month, while Google Cloud Pub Sub costs $0.40 per million publish requests per month. However, both services offer a free tier that allows you to enjoy a limited number of notifications each month without extra charge.
Winner: Google Cloud Pub Sub
Google comes out on top regarding pricing, with $0.10 less per million publish requests per month than AWS SNS.
Usability
Both AWS SNS and Google Cloud Pub Sub offer user-friendly dashboards, API documentation, and support guides. They offer SDKs and client libraries in multiple languages. But still, we noticed a difference in terms of usability. AWS SNS comes with a slightly complex and extensive setup compared to Google Cloud Pub Sub, which is more user-friendly.
Winner: Google Cloud Pub Sub
Google Cloud Pub Sub takes the lead in usability with its simplicity and user-friendliness.
Reliability and Recovery
Both services are known for their reliability and data durability. AWS SNS provides a data retention period of up to six months, while Google Cloud Pub Sub provides up to seven days. Additionally, both services offer recovery options in case of failures or crashes.
Winner: AWS SNS
AWS SNS is more reliable and has a longer data retention period, with an added advantage of immediate and automatic recovery options.
Final Verdict
Overall, both AWS SNS and Google Cloud Pub Sub are phenomenal alerting services, and it ultimately comes down to your use case and preference. AWS SNS leads the chart in delivering low-latency notifications and reliability, while Google Cloud Pub Sub takes the crown in usability and pricing. We suggest analyzing your requirements before selecting the most suitable alerting service for your infrastructure.
References
- AWS SNS pricing, https://aws.amazon.com/sns/pricing/
- Google Cloud Pub Sub pricing, https://cloud.google.com/pubsub/pricing